top of page

How Reliable Is the Data?

  • kshepherd72
  • Nov 17, 2022
  • 1 min read

Concern has been raised regarding the quality of foot and ankle research. Authors have eloquently highlighted inherent biases in study design, effects on data presentation, as well as statistical manipulation i.e. “P-hacking.” Some have even called for statistical significance to be moved from P <0.05 to P <0.005.


Catch the biases if you can


Continuing the critical appraisal of the data is the recently published “The Statistical Fragility of Operative vs. Nonoperative Management for Achilles Tendon Rupture: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies,” by Nathan P. Fackler et al.


Using the Fragility Index, the researchers showed that in 17 studies, including 10 randomized level controlled studies and over 40 outcome variables, the efficacy of operative versus nonoperative treatment of Achilles ruptures is not as statistically stable as previously predicted.

In other words, like so many other foot and ankle controversies, the debate continues.

Recent Posts

See All
Paragon 28 Sells to Zimmer Biomet

The ongoing consolidation in the foot and ankle market is progressing steadily. In a January 28 company  report , Zimmer Biomet (ZB)...

 
 
 
Same Rate for Same Service

The " Same Rate for Same Service" concept  argues that services should be paid equally, regardless of where they are provided. This...

 
 
 

Comentarios


FIX Masthead 2000x318 v2.jpg
bottom of page