How Reliable Is the Data?
- kshepherd72
- Nov 17, 2022
- 1 min read
Concern has been raised regarding the quality of foot and ankle research. Authors have eloquently highlighted inherent biases in study design, effects on data presentation, as well as statistical manipulation i.e. “P-hacking.” Some have even called for statistical significance to be moved from P <0.05 to P <0.005.
Catch the biases if you can
Continuing the critical appraisal of the data is the recently published “The Statistical Fragility of Operative vs. Nonoperative Management for Achilles Tendon Rupture: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies,” by Nathan P. Fackler et al.
Using the Fragility Index, the researchers showed that in 17 studies, including 10 randomized level controlled studies and over 40 outcome variables, the efficacy of operative versus nonoperative treatment of Achilles ruptures is not as statistically stable as previously predicted.
In other words, like so many other foot and ankle controversies, the debate continues.
Recent Posts
See AllThe ongoing consolidation in the foot and ankle market is progressing steadily. In a January 28 company report , Zimmer Biomet (ZB)...
The " Same Rate for Same Service" concept argues that services should be paid equally, regardless of where they are provided. This...
by Vince Vacketta, DPM New research on TAA is continually emerging. A comprehensive 265-page thesis from Newcastle University in the...
Comentarios